Nonetheless, it does present some basis from which to start.
I also suspect, specifically regarding the Starkiller paper, that some
of the problems aren't all that relevent. For example, dynamic method
creation: is that something that is going to be exposed outside of
IronPython? If not, then do
On 4/20/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just came across Starkiller:
> http://www.python.org/pycon/dc2004/papers/1/paper.pdf
Unfortunately Starkiller will most likely not be released. Michael
Salib was under the employ of MIT when he wrote it and therefor does
not own the code.
I just came across Starkiller:
http://www.python.org/pycon/dc2004/papers/1/paper.pdf
<>___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Well, the point I was going to bring up last night was that one could live very
happily within IronPython, following Pythonic customs; but one should be
expected to follow the customs that exist in the CLR world when talking with it.
Some types I can see free conversions for -- particularly val
Well, the way I see it (not that my opinion is all that important, but
...) you should be able to use more explicit typing by declaring the
System.Double [] type if you desire, but IronPython should attempt to
do the transformation if you choose not to (or neglect) to do so. That
way you get b
But where should the line be drawn in favor of not throwing casting errors? I
wouldn't want to use something that didn't know how to play nice when it leaves
its own little world.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Maly
Sent: Wed 4/20/2005 11:17 AM
To:
Cool!
On Apr 20, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Martin Maly wrote:
That is a good suggestion. The initial look shows that it would be
quite
possible to implement it. I'll give it a try.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Monson-Haefel
Sent:
It's certainly possible, PyObjC does a lot of conversions like this and
it works rather well.
-bob
On Apr 20, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Martin Maly wrote:
That is a good suggestion. The initial look shows that it would be
quite
possible to implement it. I'll give it a try.
Martin
-Original Message-
That is a good suggestion. The initial look shows that it would be quite
possible to implement it. I'll give it a try.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Monson-Haefel
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 6:29 PM
To: Discussion of Iro
