Is there any special reason why this is the case? The code currently reads:
public override int GetHashCode() {
throw Ops.TypeError("list object is unhashable");
}
So it's obviously intentional… however, I'm trying to use a native
Python list as a data source for UI bi
Title: RE: [IronPython] Road Map for IronPython
Closer to the former. Obviously, it's a highly
iterative project, so releases can easily build up functionality in whatever
order is important. Python projects with syntax highlighting would be easy.
IntelliSense is harder, mostly because of Pyt
Title: RE: [IronPython] Road Map for IronPython
I wouldn’t expect it to be.
But would it be a do-it-in-a month project, or a do-it-in-a-year-with-help
project?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Arnson
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:51
PM
To: 'D
Language services are in the Visual Studio SDK realm (formerly VSIP SDK).
There's a managed library for creating them. But it's not a
do-it-in-a-weekend project to fully support a new language in Visual Studio.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith J. Far
I guess not.. lock protects reference types
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Wed 5/11/2005 3:54 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: RE: [IronPython] Array Access Problem
In the case of multi-threaded use, shouldn't valuetype modifi
In the case of multi-threaded use, shouldn't valuetype modifications be locked
to prevent simultaneous writes? If so, couldn't IronPython encapsulate the
change in a lock block in the background?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jim Hugunin
Sent: Wed 5/11/2
Martin,
I appreciate you giving this some thought. I can't think of an elegant
solution either..
I found a method called TestCooperativeLevel that doesn't use an 'out'
parameter to return the device's status. Instead, it throws a different
Exception based on the device's status. Therefore it
Drew Moore wrote:
> Jim Hugunin wrote:
> >
> >Because of the way that value types work, there's no difference
between
> >the results of
> > apt[0].X = 0and apt[0] = Point(0, apt[0].Y)
> >
> >The big question is how important it is that both of the following
are
> >equivalent.
> > apt[0].X =
Jim Hugunin wrote:
Because of the way that value types work, there's no difference between
the results of
apt[0].X = 0and apt[0] = Point(0, apt[0].Y)
The big question is how important it is that both of the following are
equivalent.
apt[0].X = 0andtmp = apt[0]; tmp.X = 0
Just cur
Nick,
This is a very tricky case. Jim and I just discussed it and while we
want to provide good solution to this case, it may take some time to
come up with the right way to solve the problem because on syntactic
level there is really no way to distinguish between the two methods.
If you need sho
Jim and Martin,
Thanks for the reply, and it makes sense :)
Unfortunately, a call to CheckCooperativeLevel() returns True, not a tuple.
This is probably because there are two overloaded CheckCooperativeLevel
methods in the Device class in the Microsoft.DirectX.Direct3D namespace.
They are:
pu
I think part of the question involved time? eg, 1.0 = next 6 months, next
year, ...
Incidentally, does anyone here have an idea of the difficulty involved in
creating a language module for VS? Being able to create a .proj, have
access to intellisense, etc would be good for 3rd-party language
There's no published road map, but that's a frequent request and we need to do
something about that soon.
The plan is for IronPython to be fully CLI compatible which means that it
should run on the Common Language Infrastructure.
I think that you're asking about compliance with the Common Langu
Martin's response is right, but I'm afraid that the best way to use
these return values might not be obvious to everyone. Python's tuple
packing and unpacking operations are often used for multiple return
values in standard Python libraries and IronPython should feel the same
way. Here's how thes
The return value and output parameters (if they are in total more than
one) are returned as tuple:
namespace N {
public class C {
public static int M(out int i, out int j, out int k) {
i = 20;
j = 30;
k = 40;
return 10;
}
}
}
Hi All,
Is there any published Road Map for IronPython ? Will it be fully CLI compliant ?
I understand that using Enum type as bit field is not currently supported and will be done for v0.7.5 release. Similarly, what about other features that we have in C# ? Any document available which general
16 matches
Mail list logo
