Title: RE: [IronPython] Plans for overloads?
Yep.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith J. FarmerSent: Friday, July 15, 2005 2:01
PMTo: Discussion of IronPythonSubject: RE: [IronPython]
Plans for overloads?
These are plans for 0.8, righ
These are plans for 0.8, right?
<>___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
The
> Jonathan Jacobs Wrote:
>
> At the moment "out" parameters are not really taken into
> account when matching up signatures, if I'm not mistaken, is
> this going to be addressed?
The out parameters are the trickiest part. The solution we are working
on will hopefully address that problem
Martin Maly wrote:
The overloaded function resolution (when IronPython calls .Net) is
currently being worked on. You probably read the original code in which
IronPython chooses the first callable alternative. The new code does
better finds out all methods that can be called and tries to choose th
Something like that would be amazing, has anyone ever used Boa Constructor
(it is like visual studio but for python/wxwidgets (wxpython). Amazing tool,
but something to convert form designs from form designer into ironpython
code would be great. A new project anyone?
From: Richard Hsu <[EMAIL
The overloaded function resolution (when IronPython calls .Net) is
currently being worked on. You probably read the original code in which
IronPython chooses the first callable alternative. The new code does
better finds out all methods that can be called and tries to choose the
'best fit'.
This s
Hi,
I am curious as to how function-overloads plan on being handled in
future versions of IronPython.
--
Jonathan
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.c
