Re: [IronPython] An IronPython IDE Project?

On 8/8/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not certain a separate IDE would be the way to go. Perhaps > add-ins for SharpDevelop, MonoDevelop, Eclipse, and VS2k5 would > be the better way? I agree. Maybe just take one of the existing Python plugins for Eclipse and make it work w

[IronPython] Re: typeof equivalent?

Keith J. Farmer wrote: > I take it that: > from System import Type > from System import DateTime > Type.GetType(DateTime).GetProperties() > Isn't what you're looking for? It is, admittedly, not what I would > expect for the DateTime type. > Perhaps DateTime.__dict__ ? My example wasn

RE: [IronPython] An IronPython IDE Project?

I'm not certain a separate IDE would be the way to go. Perhaps add-ins for SharpDevelop, MonoDevelop, Eclipse, and VS2k5 would be the better way? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Freddie Witherden Sent: Sun 8/7/2005 6:36 AM Does anyone know if there is curr

[IronPython] An IronPython IDE Project?

Does anyone know if there is currently a project to build an IronPython IDE (like CPython's IDLE/PyCrust)? If there is not currently a project, then would anyone be interested in helping me to create an IDE, I think that it really could give IronPython a boost; System.Windows.Forms is more than

[IronPython] Building IronPython 0.9 with Mono 1.1.8.2

Hello, I tried to build IronPython 0.9 with Mono 1.1.8.2. I used Debian package currently in Sid. With attached "patch", I succeeded building it, but it doesn't really run. Transcript follows: * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fepy$ mono --version Mono JIT compiler version 1.1.8.2, (C) 2002-2005 Novel

Re: [IronPython] Access to Enumeration Values

Martin, I still think it can be made better. For example, if in c# I could say: i = (int) SocketOptionName.Broadcast; I can get the correct value, but in IronPython I can't say: int(SocketOptionName.Broadcast) since I will not get the correct value back. I do see your point, but I think that

RE: [IronPython] Python Lib Socket

Incomplete. Many of the builtin modules are not yet implemented. It is going to be the focus of our work between now and 1.0 to implement more and more of those. Martin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Chu Kevin > Sent: Friday, Au

RE: [IronPython] Set not implement?

Set is not implemented yet. There is a bug in GotDotNet bug database open already. Martin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Chu Kevin > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:35 AM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Subject: [IronPython] S

[IronPython] Set not implement?

a simple example: >>> basket = ['apple', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'orange', 'banana'] >>> fruits = set(basket) # create a set without duplicates a error raise: >>> basket = ['apple', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'orange', 'banana'] >>> fruits = set(basket) IronPython.Objects.PythonNam

Re: [IronPython] Python Lib Socket

I agree that wait IronPython release 1.0,and begin work for std lib. But I wonder which lib need to port? or which level lib need to port? ex:_socket module or socket.py or SocketServer.py ? I think _socket is Low-level module write-by C,but socket.py invoke _socket,so we just need to implement

RE: [IronPython] typeof equivalent?

I take it that: from System import Type from System import DateTime Type.GetType(DateTime).GetProperties() Isn't what you're looking for? It is, admittedly, not what *I* would expect for the DateTime type. Perhaps DateTime.__dict__ ? - Keith J. Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Origin

Re: [IronPython] Python Lib Socket

Kevin, I agree with your suggestion to create a new gotdotnet group for porting the std library packages, but only if the ironpython folks are not going to do it. I have recently sent an email to Jim to get some clarity on their plans on this issue, and I prefer to wait just a little bit longer to