Oh good -- we can program in "pithy" !!!
At 07:11 PM 8/31/2005, Keith J. Farmer wrote
>It's okay to interchange 'i' and 'y' .. so you can go through each combination
>of i/y that occurs in each part.
>___
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thane
>Sent: Wed 8/31/20
It's okay to interchange 'i' and 'y' .. so you can go through each combination
of i/y that occurs in each part.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thane
Sent: Wed 8/31/2005 2:00 PM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: RE: [IronPython] RE: Numpy port
essen
essential_parts = "py,pyth,python".split(',')
other_parts = "net,i,ir,iron,fe,ferrous,-anything-but-sharp-".split(',')
for part1 in essential_parts:
for part2 in other_parts:
print part1+part2
print part2+part1
(Doesn't include "Pyronic" which I
"Pynet".. then instead of "Pythonistas", we could call ourselves "goobers".
(that's okay..)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Anthony Tarlano
Sent: Wed 8/31/2005 11:02 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] RE: Numpy port
I was thinking a
I was thinking about the name thing again and I really like:
pythonet
;-) (sorry if this brings an onslaught of new naming messages)On 8/31/05, Ken Manheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:just incidentally:On 8/27/05, Thane <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> [...]> I think that "numpy" is the import na
just incidentally:
On 8/27/05, Thane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I think that "numpy" is the import name for the "Numerical" library
> originally created by Paul Dubois.
it's worth noting that it was our jim hugunin who originated numerical
python. from http://www.pfdubois.com/numpy/ht
> I wouldn't call the FORTRAN "legacy code". People are still using BLAS
> and such because the FORTRAN code performs better. These routines have
> been rewritten many times in C, C++, and Java and people still use the
> FORTRAN simply because it does a better job. Numerical solutions are
> wha
I wouldn't call the FORTRAN "legacy code". People are still using BLAS and such
because the FORTRAN code performs better. These routines have been rewritten
many times in C, C++, and Java and people still use the FORTRAN simply because
it does a better job. Numerical solutions are what FORTRAN w
On 8/31/05, Jeffrey Sax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had a look at this a few months ago. Both numarray and Numeric use anamorphous char array for storage. A simple wrapper would mean a lot ofunmanaged memory moving around... not a desirable situation.
True.
It seems to me that a rewrite using gen
I had a look at this a few months ago. Both numarray and Numeric use an
amorphous char array for storage. A simple wrapper would mean a lot of
unmanaged memory moving around... not a desirable situation.
It seems to me that a rewrite using generics is most appropriate. The CLR
generics should tak
10 matches
Mail list logo
