RE: [IronPython] Memory leak in PythonEngine.Evaluate ?

Hi Szymon, I believe I haven't yet responded to your questions. Sorry for the delay. > First I iterated the Embed1 sample 10 000 times. Unfortunately this resulted > in big increase in memory allocation (from 10K to >100K confirmed both in Task > Manager and with perfmon). I started looking at P

RE: [IronPython] IronPython 0.9.1 released

Hi Keith, sorry for the long time it took to respond, > Keith J. Farmer Wrote: > ILMerge, or GAC? We are not installing IronPython in the GAC yet because of the stage of development we are in. I am guessing that once we hit 1.0, the bits could easily live in GAC. > Out of curiosity, is there go

RE: [IronPython] More IronPython, embedding and debugging

This is incredibly neat stuff, Martin. In the "what I miss in .Net" department, do you have any colleagues who play in the .Net IDE area? Creating a builder to change the class of a control on a design surface, including moving properties and doing other intelligent code, is about 25 lines in my c

[IronPython] More IronPython, embedding and debugging

This time from Shawn, another colleague of mine http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/09/02/460216.aspx Martin ___ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpyth

Re: [IronPython] Debugger scripted with IronPython

Martin:Thank you for the links. They will be very useful to me for a future project.TimOn 9/1/05, Martin Maly < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A colleague of mine published two interesting articles on his blog yesterday. He embedded IronPython in the managed debugger (mdbg) and made the debu

RE: [IronPython] Iron Python language compliance

> We already have generators, but yes. for 1.0 we are > tragetting 2.4 compatibility (I may even implement > few of the 2.5 upcoming features such as the new > 'with' statement). That is way cool, Martin. Thanks! Regards, Ray > > Martin ___

RE: [IronPython] Iron Python language compliance

I know of the 'with' statement from Guido's presentation at Oscon. Other than that, I haven't seen detailed release schedule for 2.5 either so I am only going with the PEPs that have been accepted (342, 343). Martin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B

RE: [IronPython] Iron Python language compliance

Do they have a list up somewhere of what's accepted for 2.5? I looked on the PEP page and there is no 2.5 release schedule up. Monty > We already have generators, but yes. for 1.0 we are tragetting 2.4 > compatibility (I may even implement few of the 2.5 upcoming features such > as the new 'with'

RE: [IronPython] Iron Python language compliance

Title: RE: [IronPython] Iron Python language compliance We already have generators, but yes. for 1.0 we are tragetting 2.4 compatibility (I may even implement few of the 2.5 upcoming features such as the new 'with' statement). Martin From: Ray Djaj

[IronPython] self not known in lambda function

# Hi, # # Might this be a small bug in IronPython? 'self' is not known inside the definition of a lambda function # I tried to insulate the problem in a small (admittedly pointless) program, not to bother you with bulky app. code # I am using IronPython 0.9.1 # # Kind regards # Jacqu

[IronPython] Iron Python language compliance

Hello, I wonder, what's the targeted CPython version compliance when Iron Python is released? Is it 2.4? So we'll have generators and stuff? Thanks, Ray __ Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.