On May 10, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Jim Hugunin wrote:
Bob Ippolito wrote:
(1) Don't have mutable value types, use a reference type that points
to a value type (some kind of proxy)
I don't think that this is possible to do in a consistent way and my
suspicion is that doing this half
On May 18, 2005, at 12:23 AM, Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
On May 17, 2005, at 10:42 PM, Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
I believe that this behavior is consistent with that of CPython.
Consistent with CPython < 2.4. The behavior has changed.
Figures. I'm still using 1.5.2 :)
And you have a version of Window
On May 17, 2005, at 10:42 PM, Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
Is this bug known?
That is, if a module fails to import, a second attempt to import does
not throw an exception. I think this is because
Importer.LoadFromSource puts the module into sys.modules before
calling the import function, but does not re
On May 5, 2005, at 3:02 PM, Sriram Krishnan wrote:
However, any time that I think about changing an invariant of the
Python
language I get rather nervous about the
ramifications...
One ramification that I can instantly think of is looping over an
array of
valuetypes. On more than one occasion,
It's certainly possible, PyObjC does a lot of conversions like this and
it works rather well.
-bob
On Apr 20, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Martin Maly wrote:
That is a good suggestion. The initial look shows that it would be
quite
possible to implement it. I'll give it a try.
Martin
-Original Message-
On Apr 1, 2005, at 15:31, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote:
I guess you're right: by the time IronPython (or whatever the name
will be)
is production ready, everybody will have 2.0 on their machine. Right? I
guess it's just another Microsoft way of saying: you must upgrade to
2.0. I
don't like that tone.
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Sriram Krishnan wrote:
Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and
a 2.0
version?
I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of
2.0
specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation
Also, it's clearly not production
On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Anthony Tarlano wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice
that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of the
