RE: [IronPython] RE: Numpy port

2005-08-31 Thread J. Merrill
p-".split(',') >for part1 in essential_parts: > for part2 in other_parts: >print part1+part2 >print part2+part1 > >(Doesn't include "Pyronic" which I kinda like.) J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp ___

Re: [IronPython] How to use IronPython to generate DLLs consumable by other .NET modules?

2005-08-13 Thread J. Merrill
ads of invoking the Python engine on my way there. Is there indeed a way to achieve this? I don't see any clues on the web. Python does not seem to consume any sort of command line switches and does not offer help docs. Thanks a lot for all your responses.   Cheers, Krzys J. Merrill / Anal

RE: [IronPython] Plans for overloads?

2005-07-19 Thread J. Merrill
>create array or byref types, use Type.MakeArrayType and >Type.MakeByRefType, for example: > >>>> print Console.WriteLine[Type.MakeArrayType(Char)].__doc__ >System.Void WriteLine(System.Char[]) >>>> print Double.TryParse[str, Type.MakeByRefType(D

RE: [IronPython] Python List -> .Net Array (was PowerPoint Automation)

2005-07-08 Thread J. Merrill
rray is quite verbose compared to what we get in Python (or even C#). >>> r=System.Array.CreateInstance(System.Int32, 5) >>> r[0]=1 >>> r[1]=4 >>> r[2]=7 >>> r[3]=9 >>> r[4]=12 J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp ___

RE: [IronPython] Any have one good reason to use .NETFramework v2.0 with IronPython

2005-06-02 Thread J. Merrill
005, Keith J. Farmer wrote >Last I checked, the betas don't work side-by-side? > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of J. Merrill >Sent: Thu 6/2/2005 8:56 AM > >One other point I forgot to make -- MS works terribly hard to make it so that

Re: [IronPython] Any have one good reason to use .NET Framework v2.0 with IronPython

2005-06-02 Thread J. Merrill
gt;Why I need to update the .NET Framework v2.0 with revisions 50215, >knowing that this version is BETA!!, I work with v1.2, and I don't >need one upgrade yet. J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp ___ users-ironpython.com mailing list u

Re: [IronPython] Any have one good reason to use .NET Framework v2.0 with IronPython

2005-06-02 Thread J. Merrill
version number), instead of the very recently released 2.0 beta 2, is superior? J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp ___ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Re: [IronPython] Re: IronPython 0.7.4 released

2005-05-09 Thread J. Merrill
Did an answer to this ever come (perhaps privately to you)? At 06:54 AM 5/4/2005, Anthony Tarlano wrote >Great job geeting 0.7.4 out the door!! > >Thanks for the heads up that it's possible to just grab the Lib >directory from Python-2.3.5 and replace the IPython/bin/Lib directory >to get the ball

Re: [IronPython] Re: IronPython 0.7.4 released

2005-05-09 Thread J. Merrill
;this work done.. Please let me know as to not re-invent the wheel. > >Anthony J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp ___ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Re: [IronPython] config files vs. env vars and site.py

2005-05-09 Thread J. Merrill
elling short-term need, I'd like to wait until we >get the static compiler for cases 1 and 2 built and then see if there's still >need for .config file support or not. I expect this will be available in a >small number of months. > >Thanks - Jim J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp ___ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

RE: [IronPython] Questions for FAQ or User Guide

2005-04-27 Thread J. Merrill
I don't know what's happened with Starkiller development, but a quick reading of the first page suggests that Boo is using many of the same ideas. At 08:22 PM 4/20/2005, Keith J. Farmer wrote >I just came across Starkiller: >http://www.python.org/pycon/dc2004/papers/1/paper.

RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-04-02 Thread J. Merrill
rote >> If you liked it better with the old license and old requirements, fork the >> old one. > >If I had that kind of programming capabilities, I wouldn't be here whining >about 2.0, now would I? > >Cheers! &g