Well, the way I see it (not that my opinion is all that important, but
...) you should be able to use more explicit typing by declaring the
System.Double [] type if you desire, but IronPython should attempt to
do the transformation if you choose not to (or neglect) to do so. That
way you get b
Cool!
On Apr 20, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Martin Maly wrote:
That is a good suggestion. The initial look shows that it would be
quite
possible to implement it. I'll give it a try.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Monson-Haefel
It might be better if IronPython auto converted the list of real number
to an array in this case. If, that is, all the types in the list can be
widened to the correct type, or if the parameter is an array of
objects. That way you don't have to call an explicit method to set the
list to an array
If memory services me correct, VS.NET 2005 is supposed to provide hooks
that allow you extend the platform to support other languages in terms
of compiling, syntax highlighting, debugging, etc. Does the IronPython
team intend to release a plug-in for the IronPython language?
On Apr 18, 2005, a
Oh. Well, the magazine I'm writing the article for has first publication rights. If I posted it on a mailing list it would be like publishing it. That's why I can't just send it out. Sorry.
On Apr 14, 2005, at 8:06 PM, Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
Richard, why don't you post your article here so we a
to me directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Richard Monson-Haefel
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
