On 6/17/05, Martin Maly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello IronPython community,
>
> The O'Reilly Open Source Convention that takes place August 1-5, 2005 in
> Portland, OR will host two IronPython events.
Any chance of a web broadcast or recording?
___
I know this is a pretty minor issue, but the GotDotNet community
e-mail that has this information is not properly formatted. The e-mail
is formatted as both HTML and Text, and the HTML version does not have
line breaks () where there are newlines (\n), so your
text-bulleted list runs together. (The
On 5/10/05, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> apt[0] = pt
> What do we do here? We need to copy the data in pt into apt[0]. This
> is what it means to have an array of structs. No matter what we do with
> proxies or wrappers there's no way out of this copy. We could add some
> kind o
On 5/12/05, Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that simply returning "1" from GetHashCode() would work just fine
> - however it would mean that hashtables would effectively become linked
> lists or linear arrays (depending on their implementation). From that model,
> returning th
actly like lists.
In general when I need to do something like this, I use a subclass of
dictionary that hashes the id of all objects, not just lists.
Unfortunately I don't see a simple way to resolve this conflict when
you're forced to use someone elses hash table.
Timothy Fitz
* = Sortof
On 5/10/05, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> apt[0].X = 0
> If value types were immutable this would throw. The exception message
> might give people enough information to get started tracking down the
> issue and modifying their code to work correctly.
I want to say this should be eq
On 5/8/05, Luis M. Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding lambda, map and reduce, Guido Van Rossum has said several times
> that these built-ins are amongst its "Python regrets".
>
> This is what he said in a recent interview:
>
> - If you could change some things that have been done i
On 5/4/05, Anthony Tarlano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I filed a bug as usual, but maybe you should consider a 0.7.4.1 release
> fixing this and the *[exe,pdb] file pollution problem asap
Is the exe "file pollution problem" really a problem? Conceptually,
CPython and IronPython are doing the same
On 4/21/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nonetheless, it does present some basis from which to start.
>
> I also suspect, specifically regarding the Starkiller paper, that some
> of the problems aren't all that relevent. For example, dynamic method
> creation: is that something th
On 4/20/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just came across Starkiller:
> http://www.python.org/pycon/dc2004/papers/1/paper.pdf
Unfortunately Starkiller will most likely not be released. Michael
Salib was under the employ of MIT when he wrote it and therefor does
not own the code.
On Apr 4, 2005 3:50 AM, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, this module list is far from exhaustive... There are many others,
> not speaking about the dependencies on core python modules (for
> example, the medusa async I/O HTTP Server) which are not implemented
> yet. And Plone adds
Where there be any plans for allowing IronPython to work with an
instance of CPython directly? There are quite a few instances where
this would be extremely handy (SWIG-wrapped libraries such as
wxPython, or tightly optimized pieces that deal directly with
operating system concepts such as Twisted
12 matches
Mail list logo
