RE: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage

2005-08-15 Thread Keith J. Farmer
I've been asked: Are there hopes for 1.0 release at PDC, or (as I think more likely) DevConnections/Whidbey release? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Maly Sent: Mon 8/15/2005 1:10 PM We surely want to find the right answer before 1.0 <>__

RE: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Maly
age- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Jacobs > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 1:08 PM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Subject: Re: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage > > Martin Maly wrote: > > It is not obvious how

Re: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage

2005-08-15 Thread Jonathan Jacobs
Martin Maly wrote: It is not obvious how to approach this, but definitely our goal is to make sure that we stay true to the Python lanugage and its libraries and as I said, it is our focus from now on to make progress on the libraries and built-in modules etc. What about __future__ magic? -- J

RE: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Maly
Hi Ray, Thanks for your compliments, we are happy that you find IronPython useful. You are right, there are many built-in modules missing or incomplete in IronPython 0.9. Our focus for 0.9 was interoperability with .Net and between 0.9 and 1.0 we are going to invest a lot into making CPython and