Oh and F# = fsc.
Ab.
On 4/14/05, jeff griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Lloyd wrote:> I can't believe nobody is lobbying for pyc.exe ;)...it might make more sense. Our PerlNET 'compiler' for example is
'plc.exe', in keeping with csc.exe, etc.cheers, JeffG>>> Brian Lloyd[EMAIL P
I still think the name python.net (i.e. python.net.exe) has not been taken.
ActiveState's 2001 python for .net,
http://www.activestate.com/Corporate/Initiatives/NET/Research.html,
should not preempt the use of the name, since they surely aren't doing
anything with it and only used the name for th
My first reaction to "python.net.exe" is that nearly everyone would end
up wrapping it in a script: it's long and complex. IMHO, people like
short names, particularly if they follow a pre-established pattern (eg,
csc, fsc, plc, cc, etc).
My second is that "should not" and "will not" depend entir
Hi,
I just finished writing an article on IronPython for a magazine. If
anyone is interested in reviewing it, let me know. I'm sure I got a
couple things wrong somewhere. Anyway, its only 600 words and I would
need comments back by midnight tonight.
You can reply to this e-mail or send to me di
Richard, why don't you post your article here so we
all can read it?
Luis
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Oh. Well, the magazine I'm writing the article for has first publication rights. If I posted it on a mailing list it would be like publishing it. That's why I can't just send it out. Sorry.
On Apr 14, 2005, at 8:06 PM, Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
Richard, why don't you post your article here so we a
