Where there be any plans for allowing IronPython to work with an
instance of CPython directly? There are quite a few instances where
this would be extremely handy (SWIG-wrapped libraries such as
wxPython, or tightly optimized pieces that deal directly with
operating system concepts such as Twisted
On Apr 4, 2005 3:50 AM, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, this module list is far from exhaustive... There are many others,
> not speaking about the dependencies on core python modules (for
> example, the medusa async I/O HTTP Server) which are not implemented
> yet. And Plone adds
On 4/20/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just came across Starkiller:
> http://www.python.org/pycon/dc2004/papers/1/paper.pdf
Unfortunately Starkiller will most likely not be released. Michael
Salib was under the employ of MIT when he wrote it and therefor does
not own the code.
On 4/21/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nonetheless, it does present some basis from which to start.
>
> I also suspect, specifically regarding the Starkiller paper, that some
> of the problems aren't all that relevent. For example, dynamic method
> creation: is that something th
On 5/4/05, Anthony Tarlano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I filed a bug as usual, but maybe you should consider a 0.7.4.1 release
> fixing this and the *[exe,pdb] file pollution problem asap
Is the exe "file pollution problem" really a problem? Conceptually,
CPython and IronPython are doing the same
On 5/8/05, Luis M. Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding lambda, map and reduce, Guido Van Rossum has said several times
> that these built-ins are amongst its "Python regrets".
>
> This is what he said in a recent interview:
>
> - If you could change some things that have been done i
On 5/10/05, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> apt[0].X = 0
> If value types were immutable this would throw. The exception message
> might give people enough information to get started tracking down the
> issue and modifying their code to work correctly.
I want to say this should be eq
actly like lists.
In general when I need to do something like this, I use a subclass of
dictionary that hashes the id of all objects, not just lists.
Unfortunately I don't see a simple way to resolve this conflict when
you're forced to use someone elses hash table.
Timothy Fitz
* = Sortof
On 5/12/05, Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that simply returning "1" from GetHashCode() would work just fine
> - however it would mean that hashtables would effectively become linked
> lists or linear arrays (depending on their implementation). From that model,
> returning th
On 5/10/05, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> apt[0] = pt
> What do we do here? We need to copy the data in pt into apt[0]. This
> is what it means to have an array of structs. No matter what we do with
> proxies or wrappers there's no way out of this copy. We could add some
> kind o
I know this is a pretty minor issue, but the GotDotNet community
e-mail that has this information is not properly formatted. The e-mail
is formatted as both HTML and Text, and the HTML version does not have
line breaks () where there are newlines (\n), so your
text-bulleted list runs together. (The
On 6/17/05, Martin Maly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello IronPython community,
>
> The O'Reilly Open Source Convention that takes place August 1-5, 2005 in
> Portland, OR will host two IronPython events.
Any chance of a web broadcast or recording?
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
