[USMA:42260] change.org doubt

2009-01-05 Thread David
I think change.org is a great idea and I was surprised to see that we made the second round, mostly because we were in sixth place just a mere day away from the end of the first round. Once I saw that our votes doubled in one day I was so surprised and excited that the idea made it. However, an

[USMA:42259] Re: Rule of 1000

2009-01-05 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Monday 05 January 2009 12:34:48 Robert H. Bushnell wrote: > Tom, > You argue too much. You want science to do public policy. I want > simple examples. I say use millimeter. Example: Say I build an > intersection of roads. I lay out the curbs in millimeters, 30 000 mm > apart. > Then I

[USMA:42258] Re: Sean Hannity metric discussion thread

2009-01-05 Thread Martin Vlietstra
Gene 1. In most cases - the principal exceptions that affect the US are precious stones and metals and agreements regarding travel and transport where these are regulated by international law (for example aircraft will continue to fly x feet above sea level). 2. Supplementary indicators have

[USMA:42257] Re: Rule of 1000

2009-01-05 Thread Stan Jakuba
This discussion ignores the basic fact that all professional groups establish, sooner or later, a standards practice manual. That is the document that guides the use of units and prefixes, among other items. As an example, drafting in any engineering (mechanical, electric, nuclear, chemical, bio-

[USMA:42256] Change.ORG voting has started, tips for making it successful

2009-01-05 Thread Paul Armstrong
We need all the help we can get to make this happen. You can help in the following ways: • Set your IM status to "Vote for http://change.org/ideas/view/nudge_the_us_to_adopt_the_metric_system and then set your status to this" • Do the same for your Facebook/MySpace/etc status • S

[USMA:42255] Re: Rule of 1000

2009-01-05 Thread Robert H. Bushnell
I do not see "the ineffectiveness of the millimeter path" for film. They just have not used meters for length. Robert Bushnell On Jan 5, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Remek Kocz wrote: Millimeters as a standard in a particular industry are great, since no unit specification

[USMA:42254] Re: Rule of 1000

2009-01-05 Thread Remek Kocz
Millimeters as a standard in a particular industry are great, since no unit specification is needed, and conversions can be readily made to units one is more comfortable with, but I find it hard to believe that they somehow speed metrication. It's really driven by the realities of the industry (bu

[USMA:42252] Re: Rule of 1000

2009-01-05 Thread Robert H. Bushnell
Tom, You argue too much. You want science to do public policy. I want simple examples. I say use millimeter. Example: Say I build an intersection of roads. I lay out the curbs in millimeters, 30 000 mm apart. Then I place the posts to hold the traffic lights, again in millimeters,

[USMA:42251] Re: Sean Hannity metric discussion thread

2009-01-05 Thread mechtly
Martin, By "no change" on and after 2010 January 1 do you mean: 1. Primary Indications in the EU shall be in SI; 2. "Supplementary Indications" might be allowed to continue even after 2010 January 1 *if* the EU Parliament completes its approval procedures at some time in the future, and Membe

[USMA:42250] Re: Rule of 1000

2009-01-05 Thread Tom Wade
A very Happy New Year to you Pat, and all the other contributers in this group. I agree with you that the prefix centi is a legitimate parts of the SI as are deci deca and hecto. However, as I have stated here before, the use of centi during a metric transition delays the successful introdu