[USMA:45248] Use 62 mph

2009-06-19 Thread STANLEY DOORE
Here's an idea to promote metric. Use 62 mph (100 km/h) in the process of converting to the SI. People understand 62 mph so why not use it until real conversion takes place. It would be a subtle way for people to learn metric. I noticed the use of 62 mph in an add in Roads and B

[USMA:45249] test - please ignore

2009-06-19 Thread Bill Hooper
Sorry - still testing Still having trouble Testing to determine the problem Excuse the inconvenience Bill Hooper

[USMA:45250] Nip in Bud RE: Use 62 mph

2009-06-19 Thread Brij Bhushan Vij
Stan & all: >Use 62 mph (100 km/h) in the process of converting to the SI. Don't you agree this is a cause for NOT to *THINK MTRIC*! In a moving car, how is one able to differentiate between 62 or 60 miles. It is the HARD conversion that is causing delay in acceptance, since 62 mile is nearest

[USMA:45251] RE: Use 62 mph

2009-06-19 Thread Martin Vlietstra
The conversion rule that I advocate is 30 - 50 - 80 or 20 - 30 - 50 - 80 -130 The first line means 30 mph = 50 km/h and 50 mph = 80 km/h The second line has the same meaning, but has been extended to include 20 mph and 130 km/h _ From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [

[USMA:45252] Open Government

2009-06-19 Thread Paul Armstrong
The Obama administration has an open government dialogue initiative. This is currently being run via [Idea Scale > http://opengov.ideascale.com/]. The site is taking submissions until the end of today. Here are the current metric submissions: * http://opengov.ideascale.com/akira/dtd/5814-4049 *