John Steele is correct.
Q=It
John Altounji
One size does not fit all.
Social promotion ruined Education.
From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of
John M. Steele
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 4:08 PM
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: metricmik...@gmail.com
I agree that the ampere hour is not an energy unit. Were they claiming
three times as many ampere hours or three times as much energy in their
ad? It seems to me that the latter case is the one that they were
making. Note the subsequent phrase "compared to ...".
Yes, the larger battery depicte
Carry on, lads! :-)
Ezra
- Original Message -
From: "John M. Steele"
To: "USMA"
Cc: metricmik...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 4:08:29 PM
Subject: [USMA:54214] Re: 3x the energy per kilogram.
I will see your nitpick and raise you a nitpick. Ampere hours are a unit of
I will see your nitpick and raise you a nitpick. Ampere hours are a unit of
charge, not energy. Since the nominal voltage of the battery is not listed, we
don't know the energy.
From: James
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: metricmik...@gmail.com
Sent: Fri
If you want to be technical about it, they should have said "three times
the energy per mass".
Jim
--
James R. Frysinger
632 Stoney Point Mountain Road
Doyle TN 38559-3030
(C) 931.212.0267
(H) 931.657.3107
(F) 931.657.3108
On 2014-07-25 16:42, Michael Payne wrote:
But the mass is in pounds
Eugene,
Thanks for forwarding the NCWM comments on FPLA. An excellent set of comments
covering both the case of permissive-metric-only and the present dual labeling.
There is only one I disagree with. As much as I want permissive-metric-only, I
DON'T want it via "enforcement discretion." Enf
