And yet, Pat points out that the garment industry in Australia has been held 
back by trying
to use cm instead of mm.

And I would also contend this is not true. The argument is basically

- The garment industry's conversion has stalled.
- They elected to use cm rather than mm unlike other successful sectors.
- Therefore it is this choice that held them back.

This has the implicit assumption that if they had chosen mm then they would have been able to metricate quicker. I believe this is a fallacious argument.

Using mm rather than cm in the building industry makes sense: they need the precision. Now you have a choice between nice whole numbers in mm or clunky fractions of an inch (which is far too big a unit to base measurements on). The gain in ease of use is considerable, and that provides a powerful incentive to metricate, overcoming the natural resistance to change.

Now consider a garment industry using cm.
For the purpose of clothes size, cm is about the precision you need (mm is far too precise). However, although you are moving to whole numbers, you are moving from whole number of inches (or at worst 1/2 inches) so the gain in ease of use is not as marked, and is therefore less likely to overcome the inertia of changing from something familiar. If the garment industry had chosen mm, you would then have units that would be over-precise (imagine what the clothes rail signs would look like). You would be moving to something *less* convenient than what you had. Just because mm is the more appropriate unit for most sectors doesn't mean it is the one for all of them. Yes, the choice of cm did affect the pace of metrication, not because it was the wrong choice (mm would have been much worse) but because it didn't provide the same large leap forward in convenience over what existed beforehand than was experienced going from fractional inches to millimeters.

Now we can argue back and forward all day here, but the real acid test is this: show me an example of a garment industry that successfully completed a metric transition using millimeters rather than centimeters. Show me even any garment industry in a metric country that is using millimeters. Don't you think that if mm were the most appropriate units, someone would be using them ?

---------------------------------------------------------
Tom Wade                 | EMail: tee dot wade at eurokom dot ie
EuroKom                  | Tel:   +353 (1) 296-9696
A2, Nutgrove Office Park | Fax:   +353 (1) 296-9697
Rathfarnham              | Disclaimer:  This is not a disclaimer
Dublin 14                | Tip:   "Friends don't let friends do Unix !"
Ireland

Reply via email to