Why I 'learn' enough here! ;-) (ahem)
> From: vliets...@btinternet.com > To: usma@colostate.edu > Subject: [USMA:47723] RE: Are metric speed limit and/or distance signs > permitted by US Federal law or regulation? > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:02:26 +0100 > > > Steve, why don't you visit www.bipm.org and follow the links to the SI > brochure - you might learn something. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf > Of mech...@illinois.edu > Sent: 11 June 2010 20:53 > To: U.S. Metric Association > Subject: [USMA:47721] RE: Are metric speed limit and/or distance signs > permitted by US Federal law or regulation? > > > Stephen, > > The unit "hour" is approved for use with SI (See the BIPM Brochure, Table > 6). > > Therefore, the Inquisitor is not authorized to censor the unit "hour" in > favor of the coherent SI unit of time, the second (s). > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:31:44 +0000 > >From: Stephen Humphreys <barkatf...@hotmail.com> > >Subject: [USMA:47714] RE: Are metric speed limit and/or distance signs > permitted by US Federal law or regulation? > >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <usma@colostate.edu> > >... > > Re: censoring - isn't there a problem with km/h and > > SI? ie should it not be quoted like " X m/s ('Y > > km/h')", or that sort of thing? > > > > > From: mech...@illinois.edu > > > Subject: [USMA:47712] RE: Are metric speed limit > > and/or distance signs permitted by US Federal law or > > regulation? > > > To: usma@colostate.edu > > > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:09:51 -0500 > > > > > > > > > Sorry John F-L, but "mph" without deprecation is > > *CENSORED*! > > >... > > > EAM, Inquisitor, > _________________________________________________________________ http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/ We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
