Re: [USRP-users] Best path forward on N310

2018-10-03 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 10/03/2018 05:22 PM, Lundberg, Daniel via USRP-users wrote: A bit of background: I have been using a B205i mini to transmit a variety of pre-computed waveforms. These have ~5 MHz of BW, and I’ve been streamin binary files sampled at 6.25 MS/s. I use a modified version of the tx_samples_

Re: [USRP-users] Best path forward on N310

2018-10-03 Thread Ali Dormiani via USRP-users
The N310 SD card has a custom version of open-embedded linux on it with UHD as well. You could place your script and binary files in the SD card file system itself which would resolve streaming to the N310. The problem is the data generated has no where to go. There is 1 GB of ram soldered on the

[USRP-users] Best path forward on N310

2018-10-03 Thread Lundberg, Daniel via USRP-users
A bit of background: I have been using a B205i mini to transmit a variety of pre-computed waveforms. These have ~5 MHz of BW, and I've been streamin binary files sampled at 6.25 MS/s. I use a modified version of the tx_samples_from_file example, using a host laptop via a USB 3.0 to Ethernet ad

[USRP-users] UHD make failed with osmo-trx binaires on Ubuntu

2018-10-03 Thread Michael Benedict via USRP-users
Hi all, I'm having trouble running osmotrx with an Ettus B210. I'm not sure where the issue is so figured I would ask here. Running the binary for osmo-trx on Ubuntu 18.04, I see: :~$ sudo osmo-trx linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.0; Boost_106501; UHD_003.010.003.000-0-unknown opening configuration t

Re: [USRP-users] B200 FPGA usage between 3.9 and 3.13

2018-10-03 Thread Michael West via USRP-users
Hi Silvain, Thank you for letting us know. That is quite a jump in utilization. We will take a look when we have some time. We did recently make recent bug fixes in axi_packet_gate. It looks like that, and possibly other changes, inadvertently increased resource utilization more than expected

Re: [USRP-users] Messaging the DDC

2018-10-03 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
Marcus, Looking a little closer, I am a little confused. I can make the change, and that allows the message block to appear in GRC, but I am thinking that I need to uncomment the argument commands that set the DDS value, right? I don't see how it would work otherwise (Though it can be poked i

Re: [USRP-users] RuntimeError: Expected FPGA compatibility number 14, but got 15 in GRC

2018-10-03 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 10/03/2018 11:03 AM, ogün levent wrote: Warning message can be seen in the attachments. I'm going to guess that you have two different installations of UHD on your system, or a "half-and-half" situation. Did you get any errors when you ran uhd_images_downloader? ogün levent mailto:leven

Re: [USRP-users] RuntimeError: Expected FPGA compatibility number 14, but got 15 in GRC

2018-10-03 Thread ogün levent via USRP-users
Yes. We are trying to run the brand new device for the first time. Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users , 3 Eki 2018 Çar, 17:52 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > On 10/03/2018 10:45 AM, ogün levent via USRP-users wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > Recently I received B210 and went through the installation guide on

Re: [USRP-users] RuntimeError: Expected FPGA compatibility number 14, but got 15 in GRC

2018-10-03 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 10/03/2018 10:45 AM, ogün levent via USRP-users wrote: Hello there, Recently I received B210 and went through the installation guide on the ettus website and loaded fpga images uhd_images_downloader and everything seemed fine. When I tried to run a flowgraph I recieved Runtime error. Is it

[USRP-users] RuntimeError: Expected FPGA compatibility number 14, but got 15 in GRC

2018-10-03 Thread ogün levent via USRP-users
Hello there, Recently I received B210 and went through the installation guide on the ettus website and loaded fpga images uhd_images_downloader and everything seemed fine. When I tried to run a flowgraph I recieved Runtime error. Is it because of the fpga image version? If so is it possible to cha

Re: [USRP-users] Messaging the DDC

2018-10-03 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
Sorry, Marcus, I was out yesterday and then missed these responses. That is great! I'll give it a try today and report back! - Original Message - Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Messaging the DDC From: "Marcus Müller via USRP-users" Date: 9/30/18 4:47 pm To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.c

Re: [USRP-users] B200 FPGA usage between 3.9 and 3.13

2018-10-03 Thread Sylvain Munaut via USRP-users
And the culprit is axi_packet_gate It actually uses so much more BRAMs than the MAP process replaces some of the inferred BRAM by inferred dist ram instead to fit everything in a B200. Not sure why this now needs some much more resources than it did before. Cheers, Sylvain

[USRP-users] Can't detect usrp in VMWare Player

2018-10-03 Thread dapodun nudopad via USRP-users
I run ubuntu on VMWare Workstation Player 15 in a windows 10 host. However i connected usrp to the port using a gigabit ethernet cable and i can't ping nor find the uh using uhd_find_device. Does anyone has a solution to this matter. thanks. ___ USRP-user

[USRP-users] B200 FPGA usage between 3.9 and 3.13

2018-10-03 Thread Sylvain Munaut via USRP-users
Hi, Before I spend possibly hours tracing this, I was wondering if someone had an obvious reason for which the FPGA base design size for the B200 increases significantly between 3.9 and 3.13 ? Just a few examples : Number used as Memory: 4004 out of 1107236% Number used as Mem