Hi,list
today , I find a problem when run usrp b205mini:
b200::check_fpga_compat signature register readback failed
is the board go bad?
Thanks!
Carry
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-
Hua,
Yes to both questions.
If you drive a constant DC amplitude into a USRP sink in GR then you can
observe the frequency and phase of the FPGA “digital LO” on an oscilloscope
easily.
-ian
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 9:40 PM, Huacheng Zeng via USRP-users
> wrote:
>
> Dear All:
>
> I have some q
Thanks. Much appreciated.
Rob
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:54 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:47 PM Rob Kossler via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Can anyone offer advice regarding the RFNoC FFT scaling argument? It is
>> not clear to me if this
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:47 PM Rob Kossler via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone offer advice regarding the RFNoC FFT scaling argument? It is
> not clear to me if this argument should always be left alone or if it
> should be adjusted as needed by the user for var
On 11/19/2018 06:35 AM, Fabian Schwartau via USRP-users wrote:
Anyone? This is a quite annoying bug and I am having trouble working
around it as I cannot meet my timing requirements.
I'm only about 50% certain that sample-rate setting is covered by timed
commands. I'll talk to R&D and get back
I have a problem that I think I have a workaround for, but I would like to
understand what is going on if I could. I am guessing that it is a DSPish
issue with the way that the DDC is implemented, but I can't quite figure it out.
My design had been working on an E310 and I was trying to move i
Hello,
No ideas, advice or anything else to solve my problem?
Thank
Gwen
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:34:27 +0100
Gwenhael Goavec-Merou via USRP-users wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:42:10 -0500
> "Marcus D. Leech" wrote:
>
> > On 11/06/2018 12:23 PM, Gwenhael Goavec-Merou wrote:
> > > On Tue, 0
Hello everyone,
is there a way to increase the number of timed commands the X310 can
buffer at once? In the default firmware are only a few (can remember
exactly, but I think like 5) commands in the queue at maximum which is
not enough for my application. Or at least it would be much easier if
Anyone? This is a quite annoying bug and I am having trouble working
around it as I cannot meet my timing requirements.
Am 20.07.2018 um 11:05 schrieb Fabian Schwartau via USRP-users:
Hello everyone,
I am experencing some issues when switching the sample rate.
I have two synchronized USRP X310