Hello, Sam Reiter. Thank you for your reply.I have a test with benchmark, 2x2 @122.88M is ok(maybe the cpu “performance” is diabled in the initial test).I give the command with 3x3@122.88M <mailto:3x3@122.88M> . The output is in the attachment.
/usr/local/lib/uhd/examples/benchmark_rate \
--args
"type=n3xx,mgmt_addr=192.168.2.230,addr=192.168.10.2,second_addr=192.168.20.2,master_clock_rate=122.88e6,use_dpdk=1"
\
--duration 60 \
--channels "0,1,2" \
--rx_rate 122.88e6 \
--rx_subdev "A:0 A:1 B:0" \
--tx_rate 122.88e6 \
--tx_subdev "A:0 A:1 B:0"
Best,
Panny Wang
发件人: Sam Reiter <sam.rei...@ettus.com>
发送时间: 2019年11月8日 4:41
收件人: 王盼 <ruoyi...@126.com>
抄送: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
主题: Re: [USRP-users] questions about uhd-dpdk with n310
Panny Wang,
The cpufreq-info looks good, but the ifconfig at the bottom is a bit confusing
with what you've sent over up to this point. Can you send the exact
./benchmark_rate command that you're using (with all args included) to produce
the output you sent over initially? The MPMD info in the last couple doesn't
seem consistent with this ifconfig output:
enp7s0f0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.73 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::9604:9cff:fed2:b1a3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 94:04:9c:d2:b1:a3 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 114457 bytes 8586410 (8.5 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 3 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 179513 bytes 37029298 (37.0 MB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x95e80000-95efffff
enp7s0f1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 8000
inet 192.168.2.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.2.255
inet6 fe80::9604:9cff:fed2:b1a4 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 94:04:9c:d2:b1:a4 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 3404 bytes 296849 (296.8 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2196 bytes 243446 (243.4 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x95e00000-95e7ffff
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 63270 bytes 4016936 (4.0 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 63270 bytes 4016936 (4.0 MB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Sam Reiter
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:32 PM 王盼 <ruoyi...@126.com <mailto:ruoyi...@126.com> >
wrote:
Hey Sam Reiter,
The output of "cpufreq-info && ifconfig" is in the attchment. At the same time
I put more information about my system there.
Both 10GbE links are binded to dpdk, so ifconfig can not output them.My cpu
clock is 2.7GHz,maybe it is not powerfull enough.
It would be great If you can help me confirm my configuration .
<https://mail-online.nosdn.127.net/qiyelogo/defaultAvatar.png>
王盼
ruoyi...@126.com <mailto:ruoyi...@126.com>
签名由 <https://mail.163.com/dashi/dlpro.html?from=mail81> 网易邮箱大师 定制
On 11/5/2019 04:13， <mailto:sam.rei...@ettus.com> Sam
Reiter<sam.rei...@ettus.com> wrote：
Hey Panny Wang,
You're correct, you should specify a second address with addr/second_addr,
rather than addr0/addr1 - my bad. [1]
Assuming you're using both 10GbE links correctly, my next step would be to
investigate the processor you're using. Something with a higher clock speed is
generally recommended for higher streaming rates.
Would you be able to send over the output of:
cpufreq-info && ifconfig
Best,
Sam Reiter
[1] https://kb.ettus.com/Using_Dual_10_Gigabit_Ethernet_on_the_USRP_X300/X310
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 8:53 PM 王盼 <ruoyi...@126.com <mailto:ruoyi...@126.com> >
wrote:
Hello,
Sam Reiter. When leveraging dual 10GbE links,I specify"
addr=192.168.20.2,second_addr=192.168.10.2",last email I didn't give the
example . The result is not much diffrent with use a single 10GbE link.
I think it is "addr=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>,second_addr=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>" but not
"addr0=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>,addr1=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>". when use
"addr0=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>,addr1=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>",I get errors:
[INFO] [MPMD] Initializing 3 device(s) in parallel with args:
mgmt_addr0=192.168.2.230,type0=n3xx,product0=n310,serial0=316645B,claimed0=False,mgmt_addr1=192.168.2.230,type1=n3xx,product1=n310,serial1=316645B,claimed1=False,mgmt_addr2=192.168.2.230,type2=n3xx,product2=n310,serial2=316645B,claimed2=False,type=n3xx,mgmt_addr=192.168.2.230,addr1=192.168.10.2,addr2=192.168.20.2,master_clock_rate=122.88e6,use_dpdk=1
[ERROR] [RPC] Someone tried to claim this device again (From: 192.168.2.254)
[WARNING] [MPM.RPCServer] Someone tried to claim this device again (From:
192.168.2.254)
Error: RuntimeError: Error during RPC call to `claim'. Error message: Someone
tried to claim this device again (From: 192.168.2.254)
root@seu73:/home/seu#
On 11/2/2019 02:30， <mailto:sam.rei...@ettus.com> Sam
Reiter<sam.rei...@ettus.com> wrote：
Panny Wang,
I notice that you're only specifying a single streaming address in your call to
benchmark rate, implying that you're only leveraging a single 10GbE link. You
can specify "addr0=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>,addr1=<xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>" in your device
args.
Best,
Sam Reiter
SDR Applications Engineer
Ettus Research
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:20 AM 王盼 via USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> > wrote:
Hello,
Nate.I want to use DPDK in UHD with N310 follow
<https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_dpdk.html.>
https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_dpdk.html,but the result is not
satisfactory.I got you have some research about this from the user-list
emails(With an i7-4790k / Intel x520-DA2 and N310, to stream at full duplex,
over two channels at 125 MS/s, the lowest I can run my CPU clock freq at
without flow control errors is 3.8 GHz using benchmark_rate and the native
networking stack. Using DPDK I can run 2x2 @ 125 MS/s with my CPU freq locked
at 1.5 GHz with no flow control errors. ).
May be you can do me a favor and have some idea about my quesion.
(1) I use benchmark_rate to test the streaming performance, I only got
122.88MS/s for 1channel, or 61.44MS/s for 2x2. run with 2x2@122.88MS
<mailto:2x2@122.88MS> /s , a lot of samples dropped.
Unfortuately, my destination is 4x4@122.88MS <mailto:4x4@122.88MS> /s. I don't
know is it possible for my present host machine, or what configuration of host
machine should have?
ubuntu server 18.04 uhd:3.14.1.1 dpdk 17.11.6 dual 10GbE links (XG image
loaded)
host machine: 4 node, 8 cores in each node, tota 32 cores, cpu: Intel(R)
Xeon(R) CPU E5-4650 0 @ 2.70GHz
more informations about my host machine is in the attchachment.(hypethread
closed, cpufrequtils GOVERNOR="perfomance")
--args
"type=n3xx,mgmt_addr=192.168.1.104,addr=192.168.20.2,master_clock_rate=122.88e6,use_dpdk=1"
\
--duration 60 \
--channels "0,1" \
--rx_rate 122.88e6 \
--rx_subdev "A:0 A:1" \
--tx_rate 122.88e6 \
--tx_subdev "A:0 A:1"
Benchmark rate summary:
Num received samples: 2744145668
Num dropped samples: 6030320380
Num overruns detected: 921
Num transmitted samples: 14684137560
Num sequence errors (Tx): 0
Num sequence errors (Rx): 0
Num underruns detected: 67231
Num late commands: 0
Num timeouts (Tx): 0
Num timeouts (Rx): 0
(2) In the txrx_loopback_to_file test ,when I use the default --setting for
4*4channels, there is a error UUUUError: Receiver error ERROR_CODE_LATE_COMMAND
.
I change it to --setting 1 ,it works.
I want to know the influence to my streaming or sample datas if 1 increase
--setting?
(--settling arg (=0.20000000000000001) settling time (seconds) before receiving)
Much appreciated.
Regards,
Panny Wang
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
cpufreqinfo.log
Description: Binary data
benchmark.log
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
