Re: [USRP-users] Regarding rx latencies in B200mini

Ok, I understand. Thank you, Marcus. ___ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] Regarding rx latencies in B200mini

On 01/03/2019 11:34 AM, Brais Ares wrote: Hi Marcus, Theoretically, there'll be analog group delays that will add some harder-to-predict latency, but they'll be much smaller than the time interval represented by the timestamps. Ok, we can consider those analog delays negligible.

Re: [USRP-users] Regarding rx latencies in B200mini

Hi Marcus, > Theoretically, there'll be analog group delays that will add some > harder-to-predict latency, but they'll be much smaller than the > time interval represented by the timestamps. Ok, we can consider those analog delays negligible. Sorry to insist but, do I still need to compensate

Re: [USRP-users] Regarding rx latencies in B200mini

On 01/02/2019 11:44 AM, Brais Ares via USRP-users wrote: Hello, I have two questions regarding UHD/B200mini latencies: * We need to timestamp, as accurate as possible, some RF signal received by an antenna. Assuming I've got the device time right, my guess is I can use time_spec_t

[USRP-users] Regarding rx latencies in B200mini

Hello, I have two questions regarding UHD/B200mini latencies: - We need to timestamp, as accurate as possible, some RF signal received by an antenna. Assuming I've got the device time right, my guess is I can use time_spec_t