Re: x86 single-step issues

2008-07-13 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:28:55 +0200, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I have some more fixes in the x86 bowels about ready to send upstream. > > >From the status quo upstream, my changes get FAIL->PASS for > > step-jump-cont-strict (32 & 64), step-through-sigret (32). > > Even step-jump-cont-strict, gre

Re: Kernel oops with froggy test

2008-07-13 Thread Chris Moller
Try it now (from the sources.r.c repo): I think what was happening was that the response thread was terminating before the report_quiesce hit, thereby invalidating the pointer to the buffer. I rewrote all that code. Phil Muldoon wrote: 760 is a bash process. I'm heading out the door, be back