* Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi -
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 04:45:01PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[...]
To me personally there are two big direct usability issues with
SystemTap:
1) It relies on DEBUG_INFO for any reasonable level of utility.
Yes, it will limp
* Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
If testing utrace against its main application requires installation
of a complete enterprise distro from a distro [...]
This has *never* been a requirement.
You guys are getting
* Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
Total download size: 329 M
That size of a _compressed_ debuginfo kernel package is obscene.
We can fit 4 years of full Linux kernel Git history into that size
- 60,000+ commits, full metadata and full 20 million lines of code
flux included!
We are pleased to announce the availability of the following Microsoft customer
lists:
Sharepoint
Dynamics
SQL
Exchange
Biztalk
FRX
CRM
System Center
Visual Studio
VAR
If you would like more information or a sample off any of our lists, please
contact us at (905) 721-8456 or email us at
Well I dunno. You guys are closer to this than I am, but I'd have thought
that systemtap is the main game here, and most/all of the above is just
fluff.
That is certainly not true for me. It is true that I hear plenty from
systemtap developers, users, and boosters wanting utrace to be
kernel/utrace.c should probably be introduced as
kernel/trace/utrace.c not kernel/utrace.c. It also overlaps pending
work in the tracing tree and cooperation would be nice and desired.
Of course I would like to cooperate with everyone. And of course it does
not really matter much where a
