On 08/30, Roland McGrath wrote:
Signals. ptrace processes a signal after all other attached engines.
As my reply to that patch indicated, what you can given the
tracehook_get_signal API does not really fit that description.
Yes.
Perhaps by ignoring signr and looking at si_signo you could
Btw, is it allowed to use utrace_control(UTRACE_DETACH) from -report_any() ?
If yes, then we need a bit more fixes...
It's kind of a stupid thing to do, but yes, it should be allowed.
I think it's fine either if it always returns -EINPROGRESS or if
it returns 0 for the target==current case. It
I think this should work, but I'd like to re-read these changes carefully,
this all is subtle.
Sure. I meant it as a proposal for you to consider. I didn't think
through all the corners myself. It just seemed easier to do those commits
as the starting point for further discussion than to
E always heading south and appear to be in a powerful hurry, but the
funny part of it is I ain't never seen them coming back. Do you know
their names? No, I can't say I do, though it seems as if I'd heard one
of them called Fred. I can't say which it was. Do they always come by
on the same