Re: [PATCH] utrace: don't set -ops = utrace_detached_ops lockless

2009-12-06 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 12/05, caiq...@redhat.com wrote: Yes, it looks good so far. Ptrace tests also does not show any regression. I said this too early. Looks like step-jump-count started to fail now. step-jump-cont: step-jump-cont.c:244: main: Assertion `0' failed. /bin/sh: line 5: 28212 Aborted

Re: [PATCH] utrace: don't set -ops = utrace_detached_ops lockless

2009-12-06 Thread CAI Qian
Could you please confirm that if you revert this [PATCH] utrace: don't set -ops = utrace_detached_ops lockless change the kernel passes the test? This is just impossible that this patch could make any difference for this test-case. No, it is the same. It is true also for kernels