Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu writes:
[...] Since the speed of development in this area is truly glacial
at the moment and the practical advantages that i can experience
personally (directly as a Linux user and indirectly as a maintainer)
are miniscule so far, caution is warranted IMO. [...]
On 12/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/09, CAI Qian wrote:
- Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks, but it doesn't fail for me on this machine...
Hmm, it failed for me.
# cd /root/ptrace-tests
# make check
...
FAIL: watchpoint
OMG. Yet another test-case fails
I bet it fails without utrace too? (please don't tell it doesn't ;)
Yes.
Did you see it fails on other ppc64 machines?
No.
Ah. I didn't notice you did biarch-check, not check.
Will take a look later...
Thanks in advance,
CAI Qian
Hi -
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:16:38PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[...]
The gdbstub prototype was constructed for two reasons: to demonstrate
utrace usage now, and in the future to be incrementally useful (over
ptrace, by moving into fast kernel-space operations like
multithreading
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:24:36PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/09, CAI Qian wrote:
- Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks, but it doesn't fail for me on this machine...
Hmm, it failed for me.
# cd /root/ptrace-tests
# make check
...
FAIL: watchpoint
