On 02/07/2010 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
No, it has nothing to do with ring. It has to do with modifying code
that another CPU could be executing at the same time, and with modifying
code on the same processor through another virtual alias (they are
different issues.) The same issues apply
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:54:25 +0100
Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
No, it has nothing to do with ring. It has to do with modifying
code that another CPU could be executing at the same time, and with
modifying code on the same processor through another virtual alias
(they are different
On 01/27/2010 01:05 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
We don't need to write one. I don't know how easy it is to make the kvm
emulator less kvm-centric (vcpus, kvm_context, etc). Avi?
It's a lot of mindless work but not too difficult; replacing hardcoded
accessors with function
