On 08/03, Kevin Buettner wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:14:36 +0200
Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
To avoid the unnecessary details, consider the oversimplified example,
$ sleep 1
[1] 2923
$ cat SLEEP
set target-async on
set non-stop
target
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:39:35 +0200
Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd be curious to know if the behavior improves when you omit
set target-async on and set non-stop.
Yes, it works without target-async ;)
I think that using set target-async on is probably very buggy as it
is not used
