Hello.
Utrace patches for 3.0 kernel
0001-ptrace-temporary-revert-the-recent-ptrace-jobctl-re.patch
0002-tracehooks-preparation-for-ptrace-utrace.patch
0003-utrace-core.patch
0004-implement-utrace-ptrace.patch
also available in the following git branch
Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace working:
40ae717d1e78d982bd469b2013a4cbf4ec1ca434
ptrace: fix signal-wait_chldexit usage in
task_clear_group_stop_trapping()
321fb561971ba0f10ce18c0f8a4b9fbfc7cef4b9
ptrace: ptrace_check_attach()
The patch adds the new file, kernel/ptrace-utrace.c, which contains
the new implementation of ptrace over utrace.
It's supposed to be an invisible implementation change, nothing should
change to userland when CONFIG_UTRACE is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath rol...@redhat.com
On 06/20, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace working:
huge list of patches here
This obviously reverts some user-visible fixes, but the fixed problems
are very old and
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:16:34PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace
working:
huge list of patches here
This obviously reverts some user-visible
On 06/20/2011 09:44 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ?
Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint.
Even Xen didn't take this long to get upstream.
I can't dispute the upstream disappointment, but the obvious benefit is
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18:26AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
On 06/20/2011 09:44 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ?
Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint.
Even Xen didn't take this long to get upstream.
I
On 06/20/2011 10:28 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18:26AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
On 06/20/2011 09:44 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ?
Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint.
Even Xen
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:43:55AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
Packagers are adding these markers of their own accord, and in most
cases are getting them upstream as well. It is only kernel developers
who are so hostile/apathetic/etc.
We only deviate from the upstream kernel to fix bugs,
