On 06/21/2011 10:25 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
OK, I won't argue. So we need to rework utrace/ptrace in 3.0, then we
should do this again in 3.1. I'll try to do something.
I have a thought here, I'm not familiar enough with utrace internals to
know whether it is a good one or not.
Originally,
OK, so here's my (hacky) idea:
(1) Forget ptrace-via-utrace. Have utrace be a separate thing. This
way the recent ptrace changes won't matter.
(2) But, what about ptrace co-existing well with utrace? Make them
mutually exclusive - a ptraced-process can't be utraced and a
utraced-process
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:25:19PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I understand. Once again, it was supposed to be a temporary solution
until fedora switches to 3.1. And the reverted code does not make the
real difference so far, the user-visible changes are minor.
Yeah, I understand, it just
