On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
This is why when somebody brought up you could do a seccomp-like thing on
top of utrace that my reaction was and is just totally negative. It shows
all the wrong kinds of tying things together.
in check_dead_utrace -- it can happen if utrace_clear_tsk() skipped
clearing -utrace pointer in otherwise normal detaching sequence. This
can happen, due to utrace-u.live.signal being valid pointer at that time.
Now this can happen when execution of resumed task starts:
