RE: Re-test: step-jump-cont

2008-03-20 Thread jdike
> The behavior of recent kernels (2.6.25-rcN) and of past utrace kernels for > a long time is to preserve the "normal" behavior of TF for the program > itself. That means the TF bit is seen in eflags if user program put it > there. On x86 this can be done (and some programs do it) with pushf/popf

RE: Some testing on crashers...

2008-02-08 Thread jdike
> I ran all testsuite tests (both check and xcheck) a couple of hundred > times on a Debian 4.0 32-bit instance using the utrace-ptrace-compat git > branch kernel version You might make sure utrace can boot UML. utrace has broken UML in the past. Jeff

RE: my support in utrace.

2007-07-30 Thread jdike
> Jeff Dike expressed interest in doing it, but I don't think he has done > any of the regset work. What's there now (in utrace-tracehook-um.patch) > is just the tracehook branch part of the work, which is enough simply to > get UML to compile and work again with CONFIG_UTRACE=n (and hence, no