Hi -
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:14:01PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
* When we on the team think the utrace patch is ready to post, we need to
do a coordinated post of Frank's ftrace widget. [...]
Would you consider simply merging it into your git tree / patch suite?
Sure. The
http://web.elastic.org/~fche/git/linux-2.6-utrace.git utrace-ftrace
Frank Ch. Eigler (1):
utrace-based ftrace process engine, v2
Thanks, Frank. Your branch is now in my repo and its patch generated in
2.6-current/. I'll pull periodically, or let me know if my repo lags
behind yours
There is at least one change from the earlier behaviour -- rather than
utrace_attach_task() retrying by itself on a !parent attach, -EAGAIN is
returned to the user. That may need changes to the utrace client side.
Oops, that was not intentional. I've restored the old behavior.
I've just
Roland McGrath roland at redhat.com writes:
Hi, Ananth. Sorry everything has slid so long (again).
(I have far too many hats and the past month not so many brains!)
Here is my immediate agenda for utrace hacking:
* I have incorporated the embed struct utrace changes.
I did various
i've been looking at the patch at the utrace.patch at:
http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace/2.6-current/
hopefully, that's the latest one.
Yes, it's updated frequently. The .id files tell you what git commit the
patch corresponds to, so we can be mutually clear in making references.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:58:25AM +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 03:20:31PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
Thanks for working on this, Ananth. (Btw, it's embed.)
I think it would be less disruptive (and materially no different)
to leave utrace_flags as
