Re: [PATCH 1-13] utrace-ptrace V1, for internal review

2009-11-25 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:31:41 +0100, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: When I get the latest set of ptrace-tests by using. cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs:anon...@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/systemtap co ptrace-tests 1. Am I using the right source of ptrace-tests or has its location changed. It is right,

Re: [PATCH 1-13] utrace-ptrace V1, for internal review

2009-11-24 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
Hi Oleg, Roland, Ananth When I get the latest set of ptrace-tests by using. cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs:anon...@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/systemtap co ptrace-tests I get errors when I run make syscall-from-clone.c: In function ‘main’: syscall-from-clone.c:127: error: storage size of

Re: [PATCH 1-13] utrace-ptrace V1, for internal review

2009-11-24 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:26:57PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: On 11/24, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: ... step-jump-cont: step-jump-cont.c:140: pokeuser: Assertion `l == 0' failed. /bin/sh: line 4: 9070 Aborted ${dir}$tst FAIL: step-jump-cont errno 14 (Bad

Re: [PATCH 1-13] utrace-ptrace V1, for internal review

2009-11-23 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 11/22, Roland McGrath wrote: Perhaps we should send 8-10 to akpm right now? I'm not sure whether that would more useful. It's really up to you. IMHO those are not standalone cleanups like 2-7 (and even 1) are. So to me it makes more sense to have those travel as part of that whole