subject:"\[PATCH 24\-27\] initial stop\/resume changes"

Re: [PATCH 24-27] initial stop/resume changes

2009-09-09 Thread Roland McGrath

I merged it all. But I tend to think the function pointer is overkill. It's probably simpler and cleaner in the end to just store PTRACE_EVENT_* and have a switch, or something like that. Thanks, Roland

Re: [PATCH 24-27] initial stop/resume changes

2009-09-09 Thread Oleg Nesterov

On 09/09, Roland McGrath wrote: But I tend to think the function pointer is overkill. Yes, agreed. As I said, this code will be re-factored anyway. I added this pointer just because it is a bit easier to me to start the changes this way, currently I do not have the precise plan. Oleg.