On 11/10, Roland McGrath wrote:
This change affects ia64, microblaze, parisc, powerpc, sh. They pass
nonzero step argument to tracehook but since it was ignored the tracee
reports via ptrace_notify(), this is not right and not consistent.
This could be more explicit about the details of
Well, ptrace_report_syscall() checks current-exit_code after
ptrace_notify() and does send_sig(). But yes, PTRACE_SETSIGINFO is
doesn't work.
Oh, right. Aside from PTRACE_SETSIGINFO, it's more subtly wrong in that it
generates a new signal (to be seen again by ptrace) rather than delivering
Change tracehook_report_syscall_exit() to look at step flag and send
the trap signal if needed.
This change affects ia64, microblaze, parisc, powerpc, sh. They pass
nonzero step argument to tracehook but since it was ignored the tracee
reports via ptrace_notify(), this is not right and not
