> With current utrace it is no longer a fulltime assignment so it is OK this
> way.
Thanks for tending the suite, it's been very helpful.
Roland
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:17:24 +0200, Roland McGrath wrote:
> For any test case you found useful, please add it to the ptrace-tests
> suite. Jan can help you get it in the right form and get it committed.
Checked-in as:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/tests/ptrace-t
> I am a bit surprised there is nothing in ptrace-tests to check
> CONT/SYSCALL behaviour. I had to write this one:
That suite has grown only through regression tests for bugs that we've
noticed. So it doesn't test a case if my past implementations never broke
that case, nor if a regression never
I am a bit surprised there is nothing in ptrace-tests to check
CONT/SYSCALL behaviour. I had to write this one:
#define WEVENT(s) ((s & 0xFF) >> 16)
int main(void)
{
int pid, stat;
pid = fork();
if (!pid) {
