Re: [PATCH v2] ptrace-tests: fix step-fork.c on powerpc for ptrace-utrace

2009-12-14 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:38:27 +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote: Instead of using fork(), call syscall(__NR_fork) in step-fork.c to avoid looping on powerpc arch in libc. Checked-in. (Not seen any problems with syscall and using glibc afterwards as in the clone-multi-ptrace.c case so left it as

Re: [PATCH v2] ptrace-tests: fix step-fork.c on powerpc for ptrace-utrace

2009-12-05 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Jan, this fixes step-fork.c on powerpc. Without this patch it just hangs, see http://marc.info/?t=12592474861 On 12/01, Veaceslav Falico wrote: Instead of using fork(), call syscall(__NR_fork) in step-fork.c to avoid looping on powerpc arch in libc. Signed-off-by: Veaceslav

[PATCH v2] ptrace-tests: fix step-fork.c on powerpc for ptrace-utrace

2009-12-01 Thread Veaceslav Falico
Instead of using fork(), call syscall(__NR_fork) in step-fork.c to avoid looping on powerpc arch in libc. Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com --- --- a/ptrace-tests/tests/step-fork.c2009-12-01 17:17:14.0 +0100 +++ b/ptrace-tests/tests/step-fork.c2009-12-01