Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/2] utrace/ptrace: simplify/cleanup ptrace attach

2009-05-04 Thread Roland McGrath
The second patch ptrace: do not use task_lock() for attach has nothing to do with utrace, and it is really pure ptrace cleanup. Indeed. But it can't be applied to -mm tree, because it (textually) conficts with utrace changes in ptrace_attach(). Oh, -mm. I had not thought about the -mm

Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/2] utrace/ptrace: simplify/cleanup ptrace attach

2009-05-04 Thread Roland McGrath
Staging the utrace patch at end-of-series would make sense if utrace is not on track for a 2.6.31 merge. And afaict, this is indeed the case - things seem to have gone a bit quiet on the utrace front lately. I don't think that is really accurate. There has been a lack of any reviewer

[RFC, PATCH 0/2] utrace/ptrace: simplify/cleanup ptrace attach

2009-05-03 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Shouldn't be applied without Roland's ack. I just don't know how to merge the second patch properly. I think it would be really nice to cleanup ptrace attach before ptracee data structures cleanup, but this depends on utrace-core.patch which adds exclude_ptrace(). With the first patch, the