On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:13 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 17:55 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > [PATCH] x86 support for Uprobes
>
> So uhm,.. HAVE_UPROBE is basically HAVE_UBP?
Certainly ALMOST all the architecture-specific stuff we've factored out
of the old uprobes re
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 17:55 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> [PATCH] x86 support for Uprobes
So uhm,.. HAVE_UPROBE is basically HAVE_UBP?
> Signed-off-by: Jim Keniston
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig |1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h | 27 +++
> 2 file
[PATCH] x86 support for Uprobes
Signed-off-by: Jim Keniston
---
arch/x86/Kconfig |1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h | 27 +++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
Index: new_uprobes.git/arch/x86/Kconfig
=
