Re: PATCH? tracehook_notify_jctl SIGCONT

2009-03-19 Thread Roland McGrath
Now we send SIGCHLD with si_code = CLD_STOPPED twice. By T1 from do_signal_stop(), and by T1 or T2 from get_signal_to_deliver() which checks SIGNAL_CLD_MASK. Yes, I considered this problem. It's just not so big a deal as to worry overmuch about this corner case in the first version. What

PATCH? tracehook_notify_jctl SIGCONT

2009-03-18 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 03/18, Oleg Nesterov wrote: On 03/18, Roland McGrath wrote: It's OK to change the tracehook definition. I did this on the new git branch tracehook, then utrace branch commit 7b0be6e4 merges that and uses it. Roland, I think it better to change tracehook definition more, please