On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:53 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 12:54 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32:32PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
Here is a summary of the Comments and actions that need to be taken for
the current uprobes
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 12:54 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32:32PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
Here is a summary of the Comments and actions that need to be taken for
the current uprobes patchset. Please let me know if I missed or
misunderstood any
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 12:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
2. XOL vma vs Emulation vs Single Stepping Inline vs using Protection
Rings.
XOL VMA is an additional process address vma. This is
opposition to add an additional vma without user actually
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 19:06 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 12:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
2. XOL vma vs Emulation vs Single Stepping Inline vs using Protection
Rings.
XOL VMA is an additional process address vma. This is
opposition to add an
Here is a summary of the Comments and actions that need to be taken for
the current uprobes patchset. Please let me know if I missed or
misunderstood any of your comments.
1. Uprobes depends on trap signal.
Uprobes depends on trap signal rather than hooking to the global
die notifier.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32:32PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
Here is a summary of the Comments and actions that need to be taken for
the current uprobes patchset. Please let me know if I missed or
misunderstood any of your comments.
1. Uprobes depends on trap signal.
Uprobes
