Jim Keniston wrote:
>
>>
>> Any chance there's some actual working ubp code I could tinker with?
>>
>
> There is no implementation of ubp yet. We could probably hack together
> an x86 implementation from x86 uprobes in a few days.
>
> But we'd need a client to test it. One approach would b
Hi,
I sent a message about this to the archer mailing list, I thought it
would be worthwhile to post it here too...
El mié, 12-11-2008 a las 16:36 -0800, Jim Keniston escribió:
> By the way, there are many references to single-stepping out of line
> (SSOL), which is used by kprobes and uprobes.
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 00:17 -0500, Chris Moller wrote:
>
> Jim Keniston wrote:
...
> > Non-requirements:
> > -
> > ...
> >
>
> Just off hand, I'm fairly sure froggy will support all the
> "non-requirements." It already keeps per-client (I'm not sure what you
> mean by client--
e.
>
> By the way, there are many references to single-stepping out of line
> (SSOL), which is used by kprobes and uprobes. Section 6.1 of
> ols.108.redhat.com/2007/Reprints/keniston-Reprint.pdf provides an
> explanation of SSOL.
>
> Jim Keniston
ingle-stepping out of line
(SSOL), which is used by kprobes and uprobes. Section 6.1 of
ols.108.redhat.com/2007/Reprints/keniston-Reprint.pdf provides an
explanation of SSOL.
Jim Keniston
User-space Breakpoint Support (ubp)
===
Here is a plan for factoring out a po
