Re: x86 single-step issues

2008-07-10 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:28:55 +0200, Roland McGrath wrote: I have some more fixes in the x86 bowels about ready to send upstream. From the status quo upstream, my changes get FAIL-PASS for step-jump-cont-strict (32 64), step-through-sigret (32). Even step-jump-cont-strict, great. Does that

x86 single-step issues

2008-07-09 Thread Roland McGrath
Are all the bugs you've encountered related to single-step covered in the ptrace-tests suite? I have some more fixes in the x86 bowels about ready to send upstream. From the status quo upstream, my changes get FAIL-PASS for step-jump-cont-strict (32 64), step-through-sigret (32). There are no

Re: x86 single-step issues

2008-07-09 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Roland, On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 14:28 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: Are all the bugs you've encountered related to single-step covered in the ptrace-tests suite? I have some more fixes in the x86 bowels about ready to send upstream. From the status quo upstream, my changes get FAIL-PASS for