[uug] PHP with vim

2005-05-16 Thread Brent Thomson
Have any of you had issues getting PHP code to auto-indent properly with Vim? Specifically, it's not unindenting closing braces (althought it flashes the match like it should) and =G simply unindents everything outside of the PHP opening and closing tags (all HTML). Highlighting works fine and a

Re: [uug] Apache - Win vs Linux

2005-05-16 Thread Gary Thornock
--- Ryan Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know how stable/usable Apache is on > Windows (Server 2003) as opposed to Linux? We're not > opposed to using linux, but our sys admin only knows > windows, but if apache is significantly better on > Linux we'll switch to that. It's been a

Re: [uug] UUG website moderation

2005-05-16 Thread tuxgirl
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Michael Moore wrote: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Is anybody currently moderating the account information changes on the > >UUG website? I made a couple of changes a few days ago and they have > >yet t

Re: [uug] Apache - Win vs Linux

2005-05-16 Thread Nathan Given
sounds like a question for the waa list http://www.utwaa.org/ -- Nathan Ryan Bowman wrote: Does anyone know how stable/usable Apache is on Windows (Server 2003) as opposed to Linux? We're not opposed to using linux, but our sys admin only knows windows, but if apache is significantly better on Lin

Re: [uug] Debian Upgrade

2005-05-16 Thread Phillip Hellewell
> Thanks for the info. Did you use aptitude or apt-get for the upgrade? Which > would you recommend? apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade I've never used aptitude, so I guess I'll recommend apt-get :) Phillip -- Phillip Hellewell BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/

[uug] Apache - Win vs Linux

2005-05-16 Thread Ryan Bowman
Does anyone know how stable/usable Apache is on Windows (Server 2003) as opposed to Linux? We're not opposed to using linux, but our sys admin only knows windows, but if apache is significantly better on Linux we'll switch to that. Ryan Bowman While any text editor can save your files, only

Re: [uug] LDAP project

2005-05-16 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any tips on getting LDAP and these components to do my bidding? http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/happy.html#id2555734 This is what we did. We like it quite well. Gabe BYU Unix Users Group http:/

[uug] LDAP project

2005-05-16 Thread me
UUG friends, So we have a couple dozen windows desktops here at work combined with a few linux servers. Each user has a samba share they map a drive to. Also, we have a number of intranet php apps that require authentication. Finally, we're running sendmail but will be switching to postfix soon.

Re: [uug] Debian Upgrade

2005-05-16 Thread Byron Clark
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:03:58AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > apt-get dist-upgrade should be the way to go as it will try to upgrade > packages in such a way that the most important ones are done first. If > you can wait two weeks for the actual release, then a lot of the > problems that Philli

RE: [uug] Debian Upgrade

2005-05-16 Thread Robert LeBlanc
apt-get dist-upgrade should be the way to go as it will try to upgrade packages in such a way that the most important ones are done first. If you can wait two weeks for the actual release, then a lot of the problems that Phillip encountered should be avoided. Robert LeBlanc -Original Message

Re: [uug] calendar software suggestions...

2005-05-16 Thread Michael Moore
I've been using Sunbird for a couple months, but it's just not quite cutting it for me. So, I thought that maybe somebody in this group could recommend some other calendaring software that I might like. I've gone through the list at freshmeat, and have found a few things that seemed kind of nice,

Re: [uug] Debian Upgrade

2005-05-16 Thread Thomas Wheatley
Thanks for the info. Did you use aptitude or apt-get for the upgrade? Which would you recommend? -Thomas On 5/12/05, Phillip Hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It looks like from the Debian website that the Sarge version is going > > to be moved to the Stable release at the end of this

Re: [uug] UUG website moderation

2005-05-16 Thread Michael Moore
Hyrum K. Wright wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is anybody currently moderating the account information changes on the UUG website? I made a couple of changes a few days ago and they have yet to be approved. Relatedly, does moderation have to occur for updates to a GPG fingerp

[uug] UUG website moderation

2005-05-16 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is anybody currently moderating the account information changes on the UUG website? I made a couple of changes a few days ago and they have yet to be approved. Relatedly, does moderation have to occur for updates to a GPG fingerprint? - -Hyrum -