Re: [v8-dev] Re: An update on bit_cast

2015-12-09 Thread Benedikt Meurer
How about adding overloads for the template with pointers w/o implementation? On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:59 AM, 'Erik Corry' via v8-dev < v8-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Yes. We plan to put in asserts to prevent it being used for pointer types. > > On 4 December 2015 at 15:30, Jochen Eisinger

Re: [v8-dev] Re: An update on bit_cast

2015-12-09 Thread Vyacheslav Egorov
I would guess that std::static_assert(!(std::is_pointer::value && std::is_pointer::value), "bit casting pointers doesn't solve the strict aliasing issue"); gives a better error message than linking error. Vyacheslav Egorov On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Benedikt Meurer

Re: [v8-dev] Re: An update on bit_cast

2015-12-09 Thread 'Erik Corry' via v8-dev
Yes. We plan to put in asserts to prevent it being used for pointer types. On 4 December 2015 at 15:30, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > thanks for the heads-up. > > Did you keep the bit_casts in fletch for non-pointer types? > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:34 PM 'Erik Corry' via

[v8-dev] Re: [chromium-dev] V8 engine: compiled code cache for minified JS!

2015-12-09 Thread Thiago Farina
Moving this discussion to a more appropriate mailing list. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:55 AM, singapati wrote: > Hello > > I have a simple html page which loads a js file. > > *test1.js (2 MB)* and the same JavaScript with minified version *test1.min.js > (300 K). *I have

[v8-dev] Re: [es6] parse destructuring assignment (issue 1309813007 by caitpotte...@gmail.com)

2015-12-09 Thread rossberg
FWIW, Niko is looking into simplifying the rewriting mechanism as part of his patch now. https://codereview.chromium.org/1309813007/ -- -- v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [v8-dev] Re: [chromium-dev] V8 engine: compiled code cache for minified JS!

2015-12-09 Thread Yang Guo
The minifier probably wrapped certain parts into functions that are lazily compiled. Lazily compiled functions are not part of the snapshot. Yang On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, 14:00 Thiago Farina wrote: > Moving this discussion to a more appropriate mailing list. > > On Wed, Dec

[v8-dev] Built-in support for WebAsambly/Asm js/Low level js?

2015-12-09 Thread Teodor Szente
Hello guys, Do you think is a plus for v8 to add build-in support for these? -- -- v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [v8-dev] Built-in support for WebAsambly/Asm js/Low level js?

2015-12-09 Thread Michael Starzinger
https://github.com/WebAssembly/v8-native-prototype Best regards, Michael On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Teodor Szente wrote: > Hello guys, > Do you think is a plus for v8 to add build-in support for these? > > -- > -- > v8-dev mailing list > v8-dev@googlegroups.com >

[v8-dev] Re: [es6] parse destructuring assignment (issue 1309813007 by caitpotte...@gmail.com)

2015-12-09 Thread adamk
On 2015/12/09 13:52:08, rossberg wrote: FWIW, Niko is looking into simplifying the rewriting mechanism as part of his patch now. Sounds good. Can you add me to the patch (when it gets sent out, that is)? https://codereview.chromium.org/1309813007/ -- -- v8-dev mailing list

[v8-dev] Stubs vs builtins

2015-12-09 Thread guille
Could anyone explain what is the difference between stubs and builtins Thanks -- -- v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [v8-dev] Stubs vs builtins

2015-12-09 Thread guille
thank you El miércoles, 9 de diciembre de 2015, 20:44:31 (UTC+1), Yang Guo escribió: > > stubs are usually customized in some way and created on demand. builtins > are created at startup and are always there. > > Yang > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, 20:24 wrote: > >> Could

Re: [v8-dev] Background script streaming thread for async scripts

2015-12-09 Thread Mark Hahnenberg
Apologies for the delayed response :-) On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 10:35:37 AM UTC-8, Daniel Vogelheim wrote: (1) reducing the small script threshold from 30 KB, which was preventing >> the background thread from even attempting to parse many scripts. >> > > We should try this. Which

Re: [v8-dev] Stubs vs builtins

2015-12-09 Thread Yang Guo
stubs are usually customized in some way and created on demand. builtins are created at startup and are always there. Yang On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, 20:24 wrote: > Could anyone explain what is the difference between stubs and builtins > Thanks > > -- > -- > v8-dev mailing