[v8-dev] Issue 374 in v8: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler

2009-06-07 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: New issue 374 by mattrochon: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=374 I have an indexed property handler defined as such: objtemplate->SetIndexedPropertyHandler(_propGet, _propSet); where the getter and setter are, res

[v8-dev] Issue 374 in v8: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler

2009-06-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: PendingFurtherInfo Comment #1 on issue 374 by a...@chromium.org: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=374 Could you provide us with the full code for a reduced test case? That would be very helpful in finding out w

[v8-dev] Issue 374 in v8: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler

2009-06-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 374 by whe...@chromium.org: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=374 If the functions _propGet() and _propSet() are member functions of the class JSArray, they would not work correctly as callbacks, since they have an im

[v8-dev] Issue 374 in v8: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler

2009-06-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 374 by mattrochon: Weird behaviour with IndexedPropertyHandler http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=374 _propGet and _PropSet are defined as static methods. This afternoon I will try to isolate a test case for you. -- You received this message because you are lis