[v8-dev] Re: Function::Call API should allow v8::Value as a receiver (issue 24920003)

2013-09-27 Thread yusukesuzuki
On 2013/09/27 12:38:42, Michael Starzinger wrote: The same applies to Object::CallAsFunction, I think we should fix it in one CL to preserve consistency. Thanks for your review. So I've added the Object::CallAsFunction changes to this CL. https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/24920003/ --

[v8-dev] Re: Function::Call API should allow v8::Value as a receiver (issue 24920003)

2013-09-27 Thread mstarzinger
The same applies to Object::CallAsFunction, I think we should fix it in one CL to preserve consistency. https://codereview.chromium.org/24920003/ -- -- v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to