[v8-dev] Re: Handle accessors when generating Error.stack... (issue3082012)

2010-08-10 Thread lrn
LGTM if it works. http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2 File src/messages.js (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2#newcode712 src/messages.js:712: this.receiver.__lookupSetter__(ownName) === this.fun || Is __lookup[GS]etter__ safe to use, or can it be changed by the

[v8-dev] Re: Handle accessors when generating Error.stack... (issue3082012)

2010-08-12 Thread sgjesse
Please take another look, hopefully this is less fragile. http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2 File src/messages.js (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2#newcode712 src/messages.js:712: this.receiver.__lookupSetter__(ownName) === this.fun || On 2010/08/10 08:29:38,

[v8-dev] Re: Handle accessors when generating Error.stack... (issue3082012)

2010-08-13 Thread lrn
LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2 File src/messages.js (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2#newcode712 src/messages.js:712: this.receiver.__lookupSetter__(ownName) === this.fun || ObjectLookupGetter.call(this.receiver, ownName) ObjectLookupSetter.call(thi

[v8-dev] Re: Handle accessors when generating Error.stack... (issue3082012)

2010-08-13 Thread sgjesse
On 2010/08/13 07:03:21, Lasse Reichstein wrote: LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2 File src/messages.js (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2#newcode712 src/messages.js:712: this.receiver.__lookupSetter__(ownName) === this.fun || > ObjectLookupGetter.

[v8-dev] Re: Handle accessors when generating Error.stack... (issue3082012)

2010-08-13 Thread Lasse R.H. Nielsen
Yes, it should be changed, and we need an %_ApplyFunction as well. /L On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:31, wrote: > On 2010/08/13 07:03:21, Lasse Reichstein wrote: > >> LGTM >> > > http://codereview.chromium.org/3082012/diff/1/2 >> File src/messages.js (right): >> > > http://codereview.chromium.org

[v8-dev] Re: Handle accessors when generating Error.stack... (issue3082012)

2010-08-13 Thread Søren Gjesse
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=828 On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:38, Lasse R.H. Nielsen wrote: > Yes, it should be changed, and we need an %_ApplyFunction as well. > > /L > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:31, wrote: > >> On 2010/08/13 07:03:21, Lasse Reichstein wrote: >> >>> LGTM >>>